When MPs and peers vote, they enter lobbies on either side of the chamber and their names are published as voting either ‘Aye’ or ‘No’ (MPs) or ‘Content’ or ‘Not Content’ (peers). People outside Parliament thus know how members have voted: it is also a useful resource for researchers, as it facilitates analysis of voting behaviour. However,…
Author Archive for Lord Norton
More interesting search terms
by Lord Norton • • 6 Comments
People continue to reach us by typing in some interesting terms into the search engines. Some are clearly related to the House of Lords; others not obviously so. Some of the ones related to the House have included in recent days ‘how many Chinese members are there?’ (answer: at least one, Baroness Dunn from Hong…
A clash over protests
by Lord Norton • • 1 Comment
We have had some interesting differences of opinion expressed in evidence to the Joint Committee on the Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill. These have included differences between the parliamentary authorities and the Government over demonstrations in Parliament Square. When the officials of both Houses appeared before the Committee, they expressed concern over both access to the…
Not much joy on e-petitions
by Lord Norton • • 4 Comments
I did not get much joy with my question on e-petitions in the Lords. The Chairman of Committees replied that, as the last petition to be presented was in 2000, ‘I do not believe that expenditure on developing a system of e-petitioning unique to the House of Lords could be justified’. This strikes me as…
42 days detention
by Lord Norton • • 20 Comments
The House of Commons has voted for the provision to enable terrorist suspects to be held for up to 42 days without charge. Though its majority was reduced, the Government nonetheless achieved a majority to get it through. Opinion polls show a majority of the public supporting the provision. One poll also shows that more people think…
