
Each session, the House of Lords not only re-appoints its investigative sessional select committees (communications, constitution, economic affairs, European Union, international relations, and science and technology), it also appoints ad hoc committees to examine particular topics during the course of the session. It used to appoint one a session, but it moved in the 2010-15 Parliament to appointing four, including one to engage in post-legislative scrutiny of a particular Act (such as the Mental Health Act) or legislation in a particular field (such as adoption). This has enabled the House to cover a range of important issues that merit investigation and appoint committees that utilise the strengths of the House in terms of members’ experience and expertise.
Topics for investigation are put forward by members to the Liaison Committee, which then makes recommendations to the House and it is for the House to agree those recommendations. The process is thus member-driven. For the current 2017-18 session, the Liaison Committee recommended the creation of committees on:
Artificial Intelligence. This has been appointed to consider the economic and social implications of advances in artificial intelligence. It has already issued a call for evidence.
Citizenship and Civic Engagement. The committee is likely to examine the meaning of British citizenship and the rights and responsibilities attached to citizenship. The Liaison Committee envisaged that it would also address such questions as how civic engagement is manifested in different parts of society and the barriers to citizenship affecting particular parts of society, including marginalised communities.
Political Polling and Digital Media. As the Liaison Committee noted, ‘While both political polling and social/digital media undoubtedly have an effect on political discourse, relatively little work has been carried out to assess the combined effects of both. An ad hoc committee might therefore wish to consider how the two factors interrelate, as well as how each issue affects politics on its own.’ The committee, chaired by Lord Lipsey, has also already issued a call for evidence.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006. This is designed to examine whether the Act, ten years on, has achieved what it was designed to achieve and, as the Liaison Committee observed, is in a position to address issues likely to be of interest to the public, such as conserving biodiversity, the promotion of open spaces and open-air recreation, and rural needs. It too has also issued a call for evidence.
These committees complement the sessional committees and reflect the greater specialisation of the House, working through committees rather than being purely a chamber-oriented institution. They complement the work of the House of Commons, covering subjects not covered by the departmental and other investigative select committees. The use of ad hoc committees enables the House to move to address important issues of current concern and to do so on a flexible basis. The sessional limit gives a committee time to produce substantial, evidence-based reports (some issue interim reports before the final one) and for government to respond. The result is examination of a range of important subjects, making efficient use of resources. The committees enable engagement with those outside the House who wish to contribute. Those established for this session cover subjects of importance to the health of our political system. Those with an interest in their work are encouraged to contribute as well as follow their proceedings.
I wish to make submissions to the calls for evidence that you notify are being issued;
but I have disabilities and impairments, and certain increasing ‘frailties’ as my 19th October 2017 90th ‘birthday’ approaches;
and being ‘retired’ have only Lifeplace abilities but no adequate Workplace skills nor even micro-skills
[as may be mandatory for completing such citizen’s formal submissions to government and to such calls-for-‘evidence’
such as these new (probably very welcome) ‘calls’ probably do.
————-
All I can say ‘up-front’ is that my previous and current submissions to Lords of the Blog (since May 2010) have expressed my experiences, ‘life-commitments’, and current thinking;
and that I am voluntarily running three not-for-profit, power nor prestige
e-sites with further similar – but often broader, deeper and more detailed – content, reference, and implication.
http://lifefresh.net ;
http://www.one-human-living.com ;
http://www.lifefresh.co.uk .
And that I wish to make further comment hereunder, hereto, too.
3
(4) Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 :
I believe, and to some real; extent also “think”, that “unfinished-historicly”a constitutional-and-real-life peaceful-revolution is overdue;
and that a major preparatory “shift” would be the de-urbanisation creation of “Sustainworthy-ing Self-Sufficient Egalitarian-Leasehold Rural Estates, Villages and Towns” all over the United Kingdom.
Given a concomitantly similarly “greater-seismic shift”, into “one-human-being needs just one-human-living” , and the intrinsic “holistic-health-building” that will have to become a separate service from the “Medical National Illnesses-&-Hospitals Sector” (currently mis-named National Health Service –
many present city-dwelling workers would be enabled to “distance-work” via computers and telephones from within their dwellings in their “Egalitarianly-Leasehold Shared Sustainworthying Country Estates” thus becoming bio-environmentally positivising and “kitchen-garden plus “market-gardening” participants also – all in an “eight hour day” too.
————
(5) When the call comes for Citizenship and Civic Engagement democratic-participation-submissions, the “key” thought I offer would be –
“Re-design Citizenship and Civic Engagement
(i) around the Lifeplace and around people’s Lifeplace [not Workplace] Needs and Identities
(ii) not around the Workplace’s “social-mobility adversarily-competitive” Workplace “rat-race”
(iii) design “us Brits” under a new (United Nations)
“Sustainworthy-ing Earth Citizenship Development Model and Index”.
——————
[ I “see” such to be an integral part of the
“New Human-Civilisational Longest-Term Strategic and Immediate-Emergency ‘Bottom-Line’”. ]