<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lords of the Blog &#8211; back open for business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lordsoftheblog.net/2010/05/12/lords-of-the-blog-back-open-for-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2010/05/12/lords-of-the-blog-back-open-for-business/</link>
	<description>Life and Work in the House of Lords</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sydney Denton Miles</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2010/05/12/lords-of-the-blog-back-open-for-business/comment-page-1/#comment-11283</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sydney Denton Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.net/?p=5016#comment-11283</guid>
		<description>How soon could we parliamentary bloggers be graded according to 
1) readable number of words in our blog/comment  
2) newness or unfamiliarity of topic, supported by reference (e.g. for greater Enablement of The People, in a cooperative neighbourhood pre-political discussion institution, as prerequisite to further empowerment of The People further upwards into the unalterably entrenched competitive strata of politics (Barber 2003 &quot;Strong Democracy: participatory politics for a new age)&quot;; Toynbee &amp; Walker2009 &quot;Unjust Rewards: ending the greed that is bankrupting Britain  
3) evaluation/prioritisation of the blog&#039;s content; or forwarding to a more appropriate level or public-exposure Media ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How soon could we parliamentary bloggers be graded according to<br />
1) readable number of words in our blog/comment<br />
2) newness or unfamiliarity of topic, supported by reference (e.g. for greater Enablement of The People, in a cooperative neighbourhood pre-political discussion institution, as prerequisite to further empowerment of The People further upwards into the unalterably entrenched competitive strata of politics (Barber 2003 &#8220;Strong Democracy: participatory politics for a new age)&#8221;; Toynbee &amp; Walker2009 &#8220;Unjust Rewards: ending the greed that is bankrupting Britain<br />
3) evaluation/prioritisation of the blog&#8217;s content; or forwarding to a more appropriate level or public-exposure Media ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank W. Summers III</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2010/05/12/lords-of-the-blog-back-open-for-business/comment-page-1/#comment-10932</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank W. Summers III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 16:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.net/?p=5016#comment-10932</guid>
		<description>It is nice to have your fine service to parliamentarianism and Parliament back. Thank you Hansard Society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is nice to have your fine service to parliamentarianism and Parliament back. Thank you Hansard Society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

