<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quiz questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lordsoftheblog.net/2009/09/12/quiz-questions-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2009/09/12/quiz-questions-5/</link>
	<description>Life and Work in the House of Lords</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordnorton</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2009/09/12/quiz-questions-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5436</link>
		<dc:creator>lordnorton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.net/?p=3487#comment-5436</guid>
		<description>Bedd Gelert: For the same reason the NSPCC did not spot the implications when the legislation was going through.  On the face of it, the provisions enabling the Government to make provision to safeguard children will not have seemed unreasonable, but - as with many order-making powers - it depends on what use is made of them.  The answer may be that we need to provide in future for greater restrictions on order-making powers, but the problem is getting the balance right.  If primary legislation is too restrictive, it can create obvious problems (requiring new legislation), and if delegated legislation is too broad it may lend itself to mis-use by the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bedd Gelert: For the same reason the NSPCC did not spot the implications when the legislation was going through.  On the face of it, the provisions enabling the Government to make provision to safeguard children will not have seemed unreasonable, but &#8211; as with many order-making powers &#8211; it depends on what use is made of them.  The answer may be that we need to provide in future for greater restrictions on order-making powers, but the problem is getting the balance right.  If primary legislation is too restrictive, it can create obvious problems (requiring new legislation), and if delegated legislation is too broad it may lend itself to mis-use by the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bedd Gelert</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2009/09/12/quiz-questions-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5435</link>
		<dc:creator>Bedd Gelert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.net/?p=3487#comment-5435</guid>
		<description>Here is my rather &#039;impertinent&#039; question in search of a &#039;pertinent&#039; answer...

If the House of Lords is so good, why on the earth is the ridiculous ill-thought legislation on &#039;Vetting and Barring&#039; getting on the statue books ??

If the NSPCC could spot this is dangerous and ineffective legislation, why couldn&#039;t you ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my rather &#8216;impertinent&#8217; question in search of a &#8216;pertinent&#8217; answer&#8230;</p>
<p>If the House of Lords is so good, why on the earth is the ridiculous ill-thought legislation on &#8216;Vetting and Barring&#8217; getting on the statue books ??</p>
<p>If the NSPCC could spot this is dangerous and ineffective legislation, why couldn&#8217;t you ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordnorton</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2009/09/12/quiz-questions-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5434</link>
		<dc:creator>lordnorton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.net/?p=3487#comment-5434</guid>
		<description>A limited number of entries this week for what I thought were a couple of not overly difficult questions.

There are eight peers presently in the House who have held the office of Government Chief Whip in the House of Commons.  Robin Lewis (second time round), Ulysses and Jonathan name them correctly.  Croft: You added Lord Mellish, who died in 1998, and Lord Foster of Bishop Auckland, who was Opposition Chief Whip but never held the post of Government Chief Whip.  The answer to the second question was Lord Mawson, correctly identified by everyone.

The first two to submit the correct answers were Robin Lewis and Ulysses. Congratulations to them. Jonathan: had not Robin Lewis realised he had omitted Lord Glenamara, and submitted a new entry, you would have been a winner.

The results mean that both Robin Lewis and Ulysses have won two competitions apiece.  They join Jonathan, who has also won two.  They are just one win away from joining Chris K. in being invited to tea at the Lords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A limited number of entries this week for what I thought were a couple of not overly difficult questions.</p>
<p>There are eight peers presently in the House who have held the office of Government Chief Whip in the House of Commons.  Robin Lewis (second time round), Ulysses and Jonathan name them correctly.  Croft: You added Lord Mellish, who died in 1998, and Lord Foster of Bishop Auckland, who was Opposition Chief Whip but never held the post of Government Chief Whip.  The answer to the second question was Lord Mawson, correctly identified by everyone.</p>
<p>The first two to submit the correct answers were Robin Lewis and Ulysses. Congratulations to them. Jonathan: had not Robin Lewis realised he had omitted Lord Glenamara, and submitted a new entry, you would have been a winner.</p>
<p>The results mean that both Robin Lewis and Ulysses have won two competitions apiece.  They join Jonathan, who has also won two.  They are just one win away from joining Chris K. in being invited to tea at the Lords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2009/09/12/quiz-questions-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5433</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.net/?p=3487#comment-5433</guid>
		<description>I know I&#039;m far too late today to win, but just for the fun of it:

1. Baroness Taylor of Bolton and Lord Glenamara (Lab), and Lords Wakeham, Waddington, Renton of Mount Harry, Ryder of Wensum, Goodlad and Jolping (all Con). So that makes eight.

2. Lord Mawson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I&#8217;m far too late today to win, but just for the fun of it:</p>
<p>1. Baroness Taylor of Bolton and Lord Glenamara (Lab), and Lords Wakeham, Waddington, Renton of Mount Harry, Ryder of Wensum, Goodlad and Jolping (all Con). So that makes eight.</p>
<p>2. Lord Mawson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulysses</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2009/09/12/quiz-questions-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5432</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulysses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.net/?p=3487#comment-5432</guid>
		<description>Question 1:
There are eight:
Lord Glenamara
Lord Jopling
Lord Wakeham
Lord Waddington
Lord Renton of Mount Harry
Lord Ryder of Wensum
Lord Goodlad
Baroness Taylor of Bolton

Question 2:
Lord Mawson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question 1:<br />
There are eight:<br />
Lord Glenamara<br />
Lord Jopling<br />
Lord Wakeham<br />
Lord Waddington<br />
Lord Renton of Mount Harry<br />
Lord Ryder of Wensum<br />
Lord Goodlad<br />
Baroness Taylor of Bolton</p>
<p>Question 2:<br />
Lord Mawson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Lewis</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2009/09/12/quiz-questions-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5431</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.net/?p=3487#comment-5431</guid>
		<description>Please disregard my earlier answer. In my haste, I forgot Comrade Ted.  Please find my updated answer below.

1) Eight – Lord Glenamara, Lord Jopling, Lord Wakeham, Lord Waddington, Lord Renton of Mount Harry, Lord Ryder of Wensum, Lord Goodlad, Baroness Taylor of Bolton

2) Lord Mawson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please disregard my earlier answer. In my haste, I forgot Comrade Ted.  Please find my updated answer below.</p>
<p>1) Eight – Lord Glenamara, Lord Jopling, Lord Wakeham, Lord Waddington, Lord Renton of Mount Harry, Lord Ryder of Wensum, Lord Goodlad, Baroness Taylor of Bolton</p>
<p>2) Lord Mawson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Croft</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2009/09/12/quiz-questions-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5430</link>
		<dc:creator>Croft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.net/?p=3487#comment-5430</guid>
		<description>10 Jopling, Wakeham, Waddington, Renton of Mount Harry, Ryder of Wensum, Goodlad, Glenamara, Mellish, Foster of Bishop Auckland &amp;
Taylor of Bolton

2) Lord Mawson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 Jopling, Wakeham, Waddington, Renton of Mount Harry, Ryder of Wensum, Goodlad, Glenamara, Mellish, Foster of Bishop Auckland &amp;<br />
Taylor of Bolton</p>
<p>2) Lord Mawson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Lewis</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2009/09/12/quiz-questions-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5429</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.net/?p=3487#comment-5429</guid>
		<description>1) Seven - Lord Jopling, Lord Wakeham, Lord Waddington, Lord Renton of Mount Harry, Lord Ryder of Wensum, Lord Goodlad, Baroness Taylor of Bolton

2) Lord Mawson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Seven &#8211; Lord Jopling, Lord Wakeham, Lord Waddington, Lord Renton of Mount Harry, Lord Ryder of Wensum, Lord Goodlad, Baroness Taylor of Bolton</p>
<p>2) Lord Mawson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

