<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constitutional change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lordsoftheblog.net/2008/12/17/constitutional-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2008/12/17/constitutional-change/</link>
	<description>Life and Work in the House of Lords</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:00:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordnorton</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2008/12/17/constitutional-change/comment-page-1/#comment-2499</link>
		<dc:creator>lordnorton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.wordpress.com/?p=1256#comment-2499</guid>
		<description>Adrian Kidney: I was very careful to say that I wanted a commission that could make sense of where we are and not one to tell us where to go.  Before we even contemplate any further change, I think we need to stand back and reflect on where we have reached.  Otherwise, we will forever be playing a form of constitutional catch-up.  If the constitution is looked at holistically, I suspect people may see just how effectively the present House of Lords contributes to a political system marked by what I have elsewhere termed core accountability.  We need to be aware of pressures that would fragment that core accountability and render the system less, not more, responsive to the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian Kidney: I was very careful to say that I wanted a commission that could make sense of where we are and not one to tell us where to go.  Before we even contemplate any further change, I think we need to stand back and reflect on where we have reached.  Otherwise, we will forever be playing a form of constitutional catch-up.  If the constitution is looked at holistically, I suspect people may see just how effectively the present House of Lords contributes to a political system marked by what I have elsewhere termed core accountability.  We need to be aware of pressures that would fragment that core accountability and render the system less, not more, responsive to the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McDuff</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2008/12/17/constitutional-change/comment-page-1/#comment-2498</link>
		<dc:creator>McDuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.wordpress.com/?p=1256#comment-2498</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not very popular but I am pretty demanding.  It&#039;s possible that by working together we could achieve some balance here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not very popular but I am pretty demanding.  It&#8217;s possible that by working together we could achieve some balance here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Kidney</title>
		<link>http://lordsoftheblog.net/2008/12/17/constitutional-change/comment-page-1/#comment-2497</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Kidney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lordsoftheblog.wordpress.com/?p=1256#comment-2497</guid>
		<description>Thankyou my Lord.

Lord Norton, in your speech you call for a Royal Commission (or equivalent) to assess the Constitution holistically - wouldn&#039;t you be fearful of it creating a whole other bag of horrendously thought out reforms, such as once again suggesting election to the Upper House?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankyou my Lord.</p>
<p>Lord Norton, in your speech you call for a Royal Commission (or equivalent) to assess the Constitution holistically &#8211; wouldn&#8217;t you be fearful of it creating a whole other bag of horrendously thought out reforms, such as once again suggesting election to the Upper House?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

